Eli Smith Eli Smith's Profile Page

Eli Smith Eli Smith

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Salesforce AP-223 Exam - AP-223 Zertifizierungsantworten

Wenn Sie finden, dass unsere AP-223 Prüfungsmaterialien Qualitätsproblem hat oder wenn Sie die Prüfung nicht bestanden haben, zahlen wir Ihnen bedingungslos die gesammte Summe zurück. Die Fragen und Antworten zur Salesforce AP-223 Zertifizierungsprüfung von DeutschPrüfung umfassen fast alle Wissensgebiete der Salesforce AP-223 Zertifizierungsprüfung.

Salesforce AP-223 Prüfungsplan:

Thema
Einzelheiten

Thema 1

Revenue Cloud Technical Design: This domain covers recommending CPQ and Billing solutions within managed package capabilities, analyzing legacy data implications, determining when customization is appropriate, and assessing project risks.

Thema 2

New Release Capabilities: This domain addresses understanding how new Salesforce releases impact existing designs and the importance of implementing current available capabilities.

Thema 3

Revenue Cloud Implementation Management: This domain focuses on leading scoping sessions, capturing solution designs, preparing for projects, and managing build, test, deployment, and support phases.

>> Salesforce AP-223 Exam <<

AP-223 Pass4sure Dumps & AP-223 Sichere Praxis Dumps

Wollen Sie den Plan machen, dass Sie Salesforce AP-223 Zertifizierungsprüfung ablegen, um Ihre Fähigkeit zu entwickeln. Wenn Sie Salesforce AP-223 Prüfung ablegen, ob Sie die geeigneten Lernhilfe finden? Und welche Unterlage sind wertvoll? Haben Sie Salesforce AP-223 Dumps gewählt? Wenn ja, sorgen Sie sich bitte nicht um den Misserfolg.

Salesforce CPQ and Billing Consultant Accredited Professional AP-223 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q37-Q42):

37. Frage
Which Type of Documentation comes first in a Salesforce cpq scoping session?

A. Products and Bundles
B. Order Management
C. Business Process Mapping
D. Quote Documentation And Plggins

Antwort: C

Begründung:
In a Salesforce CPQ scoping session, the first documentation created is the Business Process Map, because:
It defines the customer's selling, quoting, approval, pricing, contracting, renewal, and ordering processes.
It ensures all stakeholders are aligned on "how the business works now" before CPQ design begins.
Only after processes are mapped can product structure, order management, and quote document needs be designed.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud methodology always starts with:
Business Process Documentation → Requirements → Solution Design
Thus C is correct.

38. Frage
An order has 5 order products that bill monthly.
One of the order products require 2 months of charges to appear on the next invoice without modifying invoicing for the other order products.
What field will need to be used to accomplish this task?

A. Bill Now
B. Bill Through Date Override
C. Override Next Billing Date
D. Hold Billing - C. Target Date

Antwort: C

Begründung:
The requirement:
One Order Product must invoice 2 months of charges on the next invoice, without affecting the other 4 Order Products.
To do this, you must tell Billing to:
Skip 1 billing cycle
Jump ahead to a future billing date
Without impacting other Order Products
Without modifying invoicing schedule globally
The correct way is to set:
✔ Override Next Billing Date→ This forces the next invoice line to include charges up to the new date, resulting in multiple periods billed together.
Why others are wrong:Option
Explanation:
B - Hold Billing
Pauses billing entirely; does NOT create multi-month invoices.
C - Target Date
Controls invoice run date, not multi-period billing.
D - Bill Through Date Override
Controls end date of a prorated period, not the number of periods billed.
E - Bill Now
Generates an immediate invoice but still only bills 1 period unless dates are overridden.
Thus A (Override Next Billing Date) is correct.

39. Frage
Universal containers has 3 product families-hardware, software and services. their sales reps want to be able to view the net totals of various product families at the quote level.in order to support this, the CPQ admin has created 3 price rules that use summary variables to add the net total for quote lines that belong to a particular product family and intend to populate the sums to custom fields on the quote record .from a performance standpoint, which of the following is true?

A. it would be better to create separate quote line groups for each of the product families and then use quote line group auto-summary functionality
B. it would be better to create separate quotes for each of the product families
C. it would be better to use a single price rule with 3 price actions
D. the current solution with3 separate price rules is the most optimal solution

Antwort: A

Begründung:
The requirement:
Sales reps want to view net totals per product family at the quote level.
The admin created 3 price rules with summary variables → each rule sums net totals for a product family and writes to a quote field.
However, while this works, it is NOT optimal for performance.
Salesforce CPQ documentation clearly identifies Summary Variables + Price Rules as one of the most CPU-intensive parts of the Quote Calculator, especially when multiple rules are evaluated on large quotes.
✔ Why C is the correct answerUsing Quote Line Groups provides built-in auto-summary fields, including:
Group Total
Group Discount
Group Net Total
Group List Total
etc.
And importantly:
CPQ allows summary rollups from groups to quote-level fields automatically without running price rules.
Zero price rule executions → lower CPU usage
Faster calculation because summary variables do not have to iterate across all quote lines Native functionality is always more performant than custom rules Cleaner design: assign each product family to its own Quote Line Group Benefits:This matches Salesforce CPQ's recommended best practice:
Use Quote Line Groups for logical grouping and auto-summaries instead of summary-variable-based price rules whenever possible.

40. Frage
A Company that sells hardware and software has a project Requirement to migrate legacy Install base into salesforce CPQ along with the contract. Which objects will need to be populated for this effort?

A. Subscriptions
B. Assets
C. Quote
D. Order Product
E. Order

Antwort: A,B

41. Frage
You are implementing the Design Document for a large Enterprise Revenue Cloud project having multiple lookup price rules supporting a complex pricing requirement in the Build phase. During construction the customer discovers additional logic and external data stores that need to be incorporated in order to achieve the correct pricing in a particular set of use cases. You estimate the lookup price rules will need to be modified, additional rules will need to be created and API development will be needed. As an Implementation consultant what is the appropriate course of action that should take in this predicament?

A. Implement the lookup price rules immediately then review with the solution Architect.
B. Communication to the customer ongoing adjustment can be made as long as we're in the build phase.
C. Communicate these changes to the project manager who will evaluate the impact to scope, timeline and budget them determine the next course of action
D. Gather more details, if it requires a low level of effort then implement immediately before starting the next sprint. Otherwise Complete on the subsequent sprint.
E. Consult with the solution Architect first who will expedite the updates to the design documents, then implement the changes immediately.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
For a large Enterprise Revenue Cloud (Salesforce CPQ + Billing) implementation, the key themes in all Salesforce delivery guidance and project best practices are:
Governance and change control
Design-first, then build
Raising scope-impacting changes through the Project Manager
Architect accountability for solution integrity, PM accountability for scope/timeline/budget Let's walk through why C is correct and why the other options conflict with typical Salesforce CPQ/Billing implementation best practices.
1. Context of the ScenarioYou are in the Build phase and:
You already have a design with:
Multiple Lookup Price Rules implementing complex pricing.
New information emerges:
Additional pricing logic
External data stores that must be incorporated
Need to modify existing lookup rules
Need to create additional rules
Need API development (integration work)
This is not a cosmetic tweak; it is:
Scope-impacting (new integration/API work, new logic)
Design-impacting (pricing architecture changes)
Potentially timeline and budget impacting
Therefore, this triggers formal change control.
2. Why Option C is CorrectC. Communicate these changes to the project manager who will evaluate the impact to scope, timeline and budget then determine the next course of action This aligns with standard Salesforce implementation and project governance principles:
Any change that affects scope, complexity, or integration must be raised to the Project Manager (PM) Project Manager is responsible for:
Scope management
Timeline & milestones
Budget & resourcing
Managing change requests and stakeholder approvals
The PM will:
Evaluate impact with:
Solution Architect (for technical/design impact)
Tech leads / Dev leads (for effort estimation)
Decide:
Whether a Change Request (CR) is needed
How to re-prioritize sprints, adjust backlog
Whether additional budget / time is required
How to communicate to customer stakeholders
This preserves:
Design integrity (Architect still evaluated the solution)
Project discipline (PM governs scope/timeline/budget)
Traceability and documentation (updated design docs, backlog, CRs)
This is exactly how a large enterprise Revenue Cloud (CPQ + Billing) program is expected to run.
3. Why the Other Options Are Not AppropriateA. "Adjust as long as we're in build phase"A. Communication to the customer ongoing adjustment can be made as long as we're in the build phase.
Problems:
Implies uncontrolled scope creep:
"As long as we're in build, we can just keep adjusting."
No mention of:
Impact to scope, timeline, budget
Formal change control
Involvement of PM or Architect
In a complex CPQ/Billing implementation, this would:
Break governance
Risk missed deadlines and budget overruns
Create misaligned expectations with the customer
So A contradicts standard methodology and enterprise delivery practices.
B . "Implement then review with the Solution Architect"B. Implement the lookup price rules immediately then review with the solution Architect.
Problems:
Sequence is wrong:
You never build first and ask the Architect later on large-scale pricing and integration changes.
This can cause:
Misalignment with overall pricing architecture
Conflicts with other CPQ/Billing components (e.g., Amendments, Renewals, Billing logic) Rework if the Architect has a different approach Still no mention of PM or scope/timeline/budget impact.
This violates both design governance and project governance.
D . "Architect then immediate implementation (no PM)"D. Consult with the solution Architect first who will expedite the updates to the design documents, then implement the changes immediately.
This is closer, but still incomplete:
Good:
You involve the Solution Architect.
You talk about updating design documents.
But:
No involvement of the Project Manager.
No consideration of:
Impact to scope
Impact to timeline
Impact to budget
For "large Enterprise Revenue Cloud" projects, Architect ≠ PM:
Architect owns technical solution integrity
PM owns project plan, change control, stakeholder approvals
So D ignores formal change management which is critical at enterprise scale.
E . "If low effort, just do it; else next sprint"E. Gather more details, if it requires a low level of effort then implement immediately before starting the next sprint. Otherwise complete on the subsequent sprint.
Problems:
Consultant is unilaterally deciding based on "low effort":
No PM.
No formal scope/time/budget impact evaluation.
This might be okay for minor cosmetic or non-functional changes in a small project, but:
Here we have:
Complex pricing
Multiple lookup price rules
External data store integrations
API development
This is never "just low effort".
For a large enterprise Revenue Cloud implementation:
This bypasses governance, change control, and approvals.
So E promotes ad hoc scope changes, which is against standard practice.
4. How This Ties Back to Salesforce CPQ & Billing Best PracticesIn Salesforce CPQ and Billing implementations, especially when dealing with complex pricing logic and external integrations:
Complex Pricing (Lookup Price Rules):
Changes can affect:
Quote calculation performance
Sequential dependencies with Price Rules, Discount Schedules, QCP, Billing logic May cause downstream issues in:
Orders, Invoices, Revenue Schedules, Amendments, Renewals
External Data Stores & API Development:
Introduces:
New integration patterns
Error handling, retries, timeouts
Security and governance requirements
Impacts:
Technical design
Test strategy (SIT, UAT, performance testing)
Possibly non-functional requirements
Because of that, Salesforce project documentation and implementation guidance emphasize:
Raising such changes via Project Manager
Having the Solution Architect assess and update:
Solution design
Integration architecture
Managing it formally as a change request if it affects:
Scope
Timeline
Budget
This is exactly what Option C describes at the right level of responsibility.

42. Frage
......

Unsere Webseite DeutschPrüfung tun unseres Bestes, damit wir den Kandidaten den besten und bequemesten Kundendienst bieten können. Dank unseren gemeinsamen Anstrengungen haben die Erfolgsquote von DeutschPrüfung zur Salesforce AP-223 Zertifizierungsprüfung 100% erreicht. Wenn Sie unsere Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce AP-223 Zertifizierungsprüfung kaufen, können Sie zudem eine einjährige Aktualisierung kostenlos genießen. Bitte beeilen Sie sich!

AP-223 Zertifizierungsantworten: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/AP-223-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html

Eli Smith Eli Smith

Biography

Subscribe

All Access Membership